Epoch 46 Update
| Epoch 47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Label |
Vote % |
Rewards |
TVL |
Vol |
Vol/TVL |
Vol from $1 |
TVL from $1 |
$PIL / $Total |
APR |
Bribes |
Rewards/Bribes |
| Curve: USDC |
49.39% |
3,916 |
7,100,690 |
1,637,839 |
0.23 |
418 |
1,813 |
85.62% |
3.35% |
0 |
|
| Curve: LUSD |
7.32% |
580 |
920,573 |
325,940 |
0.35 |
562 |
1,587 |
96.60% |
3.39% |
0 |
|
| Smardex |
3.05% |
242 |
6,572 |
524 |
0.08 |
2 |
27 |
15400% |
6.20% |
0 |
|
| Ekubo |
3.18% |
252 |
540,000 |
359,694 |
0.67 |
1427 |
2,143 |
82.34% |
2.95% |
0 |
|
| Uniswap V4 |
33.15% |
2628 |
1,964,600 |
610,238 |
0.31 |
232 |
748 |
91.62% |
11.57% |
0 |
|
Yield opportunities
BOLD/USDC on Uniswap, with 11% APR mostly paid in BOLD
PIL is healing
One of the main objectives in PIL voting was to reach the following ratios:
- Curve BOLD/USDC = 50%
- Uniswap BOLD/USDC = 30%
Those ratios are now achieved, especially on Uniswap’s side which has gained >15% since last thursday
The next step is to remove Smardex and the DeFi Collective from the initiatives list. Now that their voting ratios have greatly reduced, the veto threshold is easier to get.
Non-USD Liquity V2 forks
This is an idea that came up during my discussions at StableSummit and EthCC.
When we talk about stablecoins, we’re automatically referring to the USD. The problem is, there’s so much talk about the USD that some people find the idea of creating a stablecoin pegged to something other than the USD inconceivable.
Despite this denial, non-USD stablecoins are gaining ground, with the supply of EUR and gold-backed stablecoins on the rise
If there is demand for those stables, then Liquity can also address this market via forks
As far as I know, the only fork in developement that allows the creation of non-USD stablecoins is the Gnosis fork, which enables the issuance of EUR.
From my point of view, we need to try harder in this direction. There are many interesting assets to go for:
- CNY, the biggest monetary supply but only 5th at trading volumes
- XAU, we can have full onchain AND trustless gold exposure)
- JPY
- GBP
- RUB, as the only Ruble-pegged stablecoin is A7A5, more known to be sanctionned and exposed to counterparty risks
Yes, building non-USD stablecoins in DeFi is hard. We have the oracle problem (it’s pretty easy to have USD or EUR price feeds but not for more specific price feeds).
On top of this, building liquidity just sucks. It is already hard enough to build a USD stablecoin, but with non-USD stuff we have the currency risk (USD/non-USD liquidity pools would have impermanent loss) which is discouraging for LPs in general.
But we still have a chance. Non-USD stablecoins have only just begun to take off in earnest, and the first issuer to succeed in building liquidity will gain the first-mover advantage.
If we have to choose, we might as well let decentralised stablecoins have that first-mover advantage instead of stablecoin issuing companies (in any case, there’s no question of letting Circle issue all the world’s currencies in our place)
What do you think about this?
Thanks for reading 